Comments for Lawmatters.in http://lawmatters.in Things that matter in law and more Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:39:57 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 Comment on Austin’s Imperative Theory of Law by Asher Joseph http://lawmatters.in/content/austin%e2%80%99s-imperative-theory-of-law-173/comment-page-1#comment-988 Asher Joseph Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:39:57 +0000 http://lawmatters.in/content/austin’s-imperative-theory-of-law-173.html#comment-988 Its fine materil, nice experience to consult it Its fine materil, nice experience to consult it

]]> Comment on Interpleader Suits by sylivanus http://lawmatters.in/content/interpleader-suits-455/comment-page-1#comment-595 sylivanus Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:34:49 +0000 http://lawmatters.in/content/interpleader-suits-455.html#comment-595 thanks but my question is that who pays costs in interpleadre suit? is it the winner of the case after the first plaintiff who have insttuted the case? the winner? the looser? thanks
but my question is that who pays costs in interpleadre suit? is it the winner of the case after the first plaintiff who have insttuted the case? the winner? the looser?

]]> Comment on The Mathura Rape Case by shiva http://lawmatters.in/content/the-mathura-rape-case-465/comment-page-1#comment-584 shiva Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:22:00 +0000 http://lawmatters.in/content/the-mathura-rape-case-465.html#comment-584 decision given by the honurble supreme court is an valid suggestion in human faith n also enpowerment of women .. decision given by the honurble supreme court is an valid suggestion in human faith n also enpowerment of women ..

]]> Comment on Company Law Board by Law Matters http://lawmatters.in/content/company-law-board-167/comment-page-1#comment-579 Law Matters Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:29:14 +0000 http://lawmatters.in/content/company-law-board-167.html#comment-579 Hey Vivek, As it happens, someone copied material from this site on to Wiki and not the other way around. Thanks for your comment though — we did not earlier know that material had been copied. If you checked out the history (which you should ideally have done before making a request like the one above), you would have seen that the addition of the article on Wikipedia shows you on the following page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=218.248.68.63 in three stages : http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Company_Law_Board&diff=prev&oldid=177883751 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Company_Law_Board&diff=prev&oldid=177886123 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Company_Law_Board&diff=prev&oldid=177887606 Assuming we've not made a mistake in reading the wikipedia editing history, presumably, that was when the content of this post was copied on to wiki. <strong>Update:</strong> The Wiki team addressed the issue extremely promptly after being notified. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Company+Law+Board <blockquote>18:11, 19 December 2009 NuclearWarfare (talk | contribs) restored "Company Law Board" ‎ (8 revisions restored: copyvios deleted) 18:10, 19 December 2009 NuclearWarfare (talk | contribs) deleted "Company Law Board" ‎ (deleting revisions that are copyvios) </blockquote> and deleted the material which had been copied. Hey Vivek,

As it happens, someone copied material from this site on to Wiki and not the other way around.

Thanks for your comment though — we did not earlier know that material had been copied.

If you checked out the history (which you should ideally have done before making a request like the one above), you would have seen that the addition of the article on Wikipedia shows you on the following page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=218.248.68.63

in three stages :

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Company_Law_Board&diff=prev&oldid=177883751
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Company_Law_Board&diff=prev&oldid=177886123
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Company_Law_Board&diff=prev&oldid=177887606

Assuming we’ve not made a mistake in reading the wikipedia editing history, presumably, that was when the content of this post was copied on to wiki.

Update:

The Wiki team addressed the issue extremely promptly after being notified.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Company+Law+Board

18:11, 19 December 2009 NuclearWarfare (talk | contribs) restored “Company Law Board” ‎ (8 revisions restored: copyvios deleted)
18:10, 19 December 2009 NuclearWarfare (talk | contribs) deleted “Company Law Board” ‎ (deleting revisions that are copyvios)

and deleted the material which had been copied.

]]> Comment on Company Law Board by vivek kumar http://lawmatters.in/content/company-law-board-167/comment-page-1#comment-574 vivek kumar Sat, 19 Dec 2009 08:07:35 +0000 http://lawmatters.in/content/company-law-board-167.html#comment-574 Plz dont copy paste from other websites (wikipedia). Plz dont copy paste from other websites (wikipedia).

]]> Comment on Austin’s Imperative Theory of Law by Gulzaman http://lawmatters.in/content/austin%e2%80%99s-imperative-theory-of-law-173/comment-page-1#comment-555 Gulzaman Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:20:47 +0000 http://lawmatters.in/content/austin’s-imperative-theory-of-law-173.html#comment-555 ooh thanks at all for help me about that theory ooh thanks at all for help me about that theory

]]> Comment on Maintenance under the CrPC by Law Matters http://lawmatters.in/content/maintenance-under-the-crpc-443/comment-page-1#comment-553 Law Matters Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:38:20 +0000 http://lawmatters.in/content/maintenance-under-the-crpc-443.html#comment-553 Hi Amit, Please contact your lawyer. No advice is given to any person at LawMatters.in. Hi Amit,
Please contact your lawyer. No advice is given to any person at LawMatters.in.

]]>