<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawmatters.in &#187; Health</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawmatters.in/content/category/health/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawmatters.in</link>
	<description>Things that matter in law and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:25:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Proposed Accessibility Exception to Copyright</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-proposed-accessibility-exception-to-copyright</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-proposed-accessibility-exception-to-copyright#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update (April 26, 2010): Please note that although this does not affect the critique below, the relevant Section No. is 52(1)(zb) in the Copyright Amendment Bill, 2010, and not 52(1)(za) as mentioned herein &#8212; Section 52(1)(za) was based on documents &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/the-proposed-accessibility-exception-to-copyright">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-proposed-accessibility-exception-to-copyright/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex Selective Abortion Rampant Amongst the Rich</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/sex-selective-abortion-rampant-amongst-the-rich</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/sex-selective-abortion-rampant-amongst-the-rich#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While it's well known that female foeticide is widely practised in India, the general perception is that the practice prevails due to poverty and the lack to education. There have been a number of studies in recent years which have disproved this. 
 <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/sex-selective-abortion-rampant-amongst-the-rich">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/sex-selective-abortion-rampant-amongst-the-rich/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compensation to 12-Year-Old Crippled in Motor Accident</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/compensation-to-12-year-old-crippled-in-motor-accident</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/compensation-to-12-year-old-crippled-in-motor-accident#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 12:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.lawmatters.in/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 14, 2008, a Bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justices S B Sinha and L S Panta United India Insurance Co. Ltd. to pay higher compensation to a woman named Sapna who had been crippled and whose marriage &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/compensation-to-12-year-old-crippled-in-motor-accident">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/compensation-to-12-year-old-crippled-in-motor-accident/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protesting the Pill</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/protesting-the-pill-470</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/protesting-the-pill-470#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/content/protesting-the-pill-470.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 7, 1965, the U.S. Supreme Court found married couples had a right to privacy in the US Constitution in the case of Griswold v. Connecticut. The case involved an 1879 Connecticut law which prohibited the use of contraceptives. &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/protesting-the-pill-470">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/protesting-the-pill-470/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Customs Exemption for Private Hospitals</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/customs-exemption-for-private-hospitals-428</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/customs-exemption-for-private-hospitals-428#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 09:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/content/customs-exemption-for-private-hospitals-428.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Private hospitals are entitled to exemption from customs duty on imported equipment only if they provide free treatment to the poor held a Bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justices Harjit Singh Bedi and Tarun Chatterjee on May 16, 2008 &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/customs-exemption-for-private-hospitals-428">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/customs-exemption-for-private-hospitals-428/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Medical Examination of a Suspected Rapist</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-medical-examination-of-a-suspected-rapist-328</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-medical-examination-of-a-suspected-rapist-328#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 03:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape and Sexual Assault]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/content/the-medical-examination-of-a-suspected-rapist-328.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Section 53A was inserted into the Code of Criminal Procedure in 2005 to make provision for the medical examination persons suspected to have committed rape or attempted rape. It came into effect on June 23, 2006. Who Can Conduct the &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/the-medical-examination-of-a-suspected-rapist-328">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-medical-examination-of-a-suspected-rapist-328/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Medical Examination of a Rape Victim</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-medical-examination-of-a-rape-victim-327</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-medical-examination-of-a-rape-victim-327#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 02:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape and Sexual Assault]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/content/the-medical-examination-of-a-rape-victim-327.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Section 164A was inserted into the Code of Criminal Procedure in 2005 to make provision for the medical examination of victims of rape or of attempted rape. It came into effect on June 23, 2006. The language used in this &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/the-medical-examination-of-a-rape-victim-327">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-medical-examination-of-a-rape-victim-327/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

