<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawmatters.in &#187; Jurisprudence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawmatters.in/content/category/jurisprudence/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawmatters.in</link>
	<description>Things that matter in law and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:25:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Codification of the Law</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/codification-of-the-law</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/codification-of-the-law#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nns1102.wordpress.com/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Codification â€” the process of pulling together a body of law into one convenient place â€” is one of the classic hard problems of access to the law. It never seems hard when one sets out; back in Merrie Olde &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/codification-of-the-law">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/codification-of-the-law/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Origin of Copyright</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-origin-of-copyright-478</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-origin-of-copyright-478#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/content/the-origin-of-copyright--478.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright is an outgrowth of the privatization of government censorship in sixteenth-century England. There was no uprising of authors suddenly demanding the right to prevent other people from copying their works <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/the-origin-of-copyright-478">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-origin-of-copyright-478/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Austin&#8217;s Imperative Theory of Law</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/austin%e2%80%99s-imperative-theory-of-law-173</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/austin%e2%80%99s-imperative-theory-of-law-173#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 07:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/content/austinâ€™s-imperative-theory-of-law-173.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law is the command of the Sovereign. One of the main exponents of this theory which is completely different from the natural law theory was John Austin who belongs to the analytical school of law and is widely considered to &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/austin%e2%80%99s-imperative-theory-of-law-173">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/austin%e2%80%99s-imperative-theory-of-law-173/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legislation v. Precedents</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/legislation-v-precedents-204</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/legislation-v-precedents-204#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 11:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precedents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/content/legislation-v-precedents-204.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legislation Precedent Abrogative power Constitutive efficacy Reversible Irreversible if it is rigidly followed. Divides the function of making law in the hands of different bodies. Unites the functions of making law and deciding disputes in the hands of the judiciary. &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/legislation-v-precedents-204">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/legislation-v-precedents-204/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obligations</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/obligations-203</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/obligations-203#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 11:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/content/obligations-203.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The word obligation originates from â€˜obligateâ€™ in Latin which means something which binds men to an engagement or performance. There are several types of obligations: 1. Moral 2. Legal 3. Political 4. Positive 5. Negative Moral Obligations Moral obligations are &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/obligations-203">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/obligations-203/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ownership</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/ownership-202</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/ownership-202#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 11:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/content/ownership-202.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Definition of Ownership Ownership is the relationship which exists between a person and an object which he owns. It comprises a complex of rights in rem. The Incidents of Ownership The Incident Its Characteristics 1. The ownerâ€™s right to &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/ownership-202">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/ownership-202/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roscoe Pound</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/roscoe-pound-201</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/roscoe-pound-201#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 06:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/content/roscoe-pound-201.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roscoe Pound is considered to be the founder of American sociological jurisprudence. His works include: 1. The Spirit of Common Law 2. Interpretation of Legal History 3. The Formative Era of American Law 4. An Introduction to the Philosophy of &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/roscoe-pound-201">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/roscoe-pound-201/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

