<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawmatters.in &#187; Legal Provisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawmatters.in/content/category/legal-provisions/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawmatters.in</link>
	<description>Things that matter in law and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:05:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>OSP / ISP Liability and the Copyright (Amendment) Bill</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/osp-isp-liability-and-the-copyright-amendment-bill</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/osp-isp-liability-and-the-copyright-amendment-bill#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(This post is a rough draft; comments would be appreciated. &#8212; Nandita Saikia saikianandita@gmail.com) The Copyright Amendment Bill attempts to create a safe harbour for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and Online Service Providers (OSPs) in Indian copyright law through amendments to Sections 52(1)(b) and 52(1)(c) of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957 (which would effectively be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/osp-isp-liability-and-the-copyright-amendment-bill/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Exhaustion of Rights and Indian Copyright Law</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-exhaustion-of-rights-and-indian-copyright-law</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-exhaustion-of-rights-and-indian-copyright-law#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abstract: An overview of the application of the Doctrine of First Sale in respect of different kinds of copyrighted works under the Indian Copyright Act, and an analysis of the relevant provisions. This paper argues that the Doctrine of First Sale applies in different ways to the various kinds of works protected by copyright, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-exhaustion-of-rights-and-indian-copyright-law/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cover Versions and the Proposed Amendments to Copyright Law</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/cover-versions-and-the-proposed-amendments-to-copyright-law</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/cover-versions-and-the-proposed-amendments-to-copyright-law#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read the entire paper on &#8220;Films and the Copyright Amendment Bill, 2010&#8243; at SSRN here. The use of an underlying work in a film other than in conjunction with the film would involve the exploitation of the underlying work through such media as video clips, wall papers and ring tones. One of the media which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/cover-versions-and-the-proposed-amendments-to-copyright-law/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voluntary Copyright Contracts and the Proposed Amendment</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/voluntary-copyright-contracts</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/voluntary-copyright-contracts#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a number of provisions in the Amendment Bill which would affect copyright contracts, namely, assignments and licences of copyright. Some of these provisions (such as those which are proposed to be made to Section 17 of the Copyright Act, 1957) are aimed at regulating copyright contracts in the film and music industry. Other [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/voluntary-copyright-contracts/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non-Voluntary Copyright Licences: Current Law and the Proposed Amendment</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/non-voluntary-copyright-licences-current-law-and-the-proposed-amendment</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/non-voluntary-copyright-licences-current-law-and-the-proposed-amendment#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 08:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright licences may be either voluntarily entered into by the copyright owner (i.e. the licensor) or be imposed on him. If the licence is not voluntarily entered into by the copyright owner, it is referred to as a non-voluntary licence, and it may assume the form of either a compulsory licence or a statutory licence. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/non-voluntary-copyright-licences-current-law-and-the-proposed-amendment/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disability and the Indian Copyright Amendment Bill, 2010</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/disability-and-the-indian-copyright-amendment-bill-2010</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/disability-and-the-indian-copyright-amendment-bill-2010#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 12:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction Disabled persons are routinely made invisible in Indian society, and the structural and societal support they receive is extremely limited – where such support exists at all. Thus far, in Indian Copyright Law, there has been no provision under which works protected by copyright could be legally reproduced in alternative formats which were accessible [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/disability-and-the-indian-copyright-amendment-bill-2010/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Principal Director as an Author of a Film</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-principal-director-as-an-author-of-a-film</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-principal-director-as-an-author-of-a-film#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read the entire paper on &#8220;Films and the Copyright Amendment Bill, 2010&#8243; at SSRN here. One of the earliest provisions in the Copyright Amendment Bill which generated (not always entirely accurate) media interest was a provision which stated that the principal director would become an author of a film. Thus far, under the Indian Copyright [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-principal-director-as-an-author-of-a-film/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
