<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawmatters.in &#187; Cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawmatters.in/content/category/litigation/cases/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawmatters.in</link>
	<description>Things that matter in law and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:43:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Validity of Advance Sexual Consent</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-validity-of-advance-sexual-consent</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-validity-of-advance-sexual-consent#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage and Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape and Sexual Assault]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=2012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The validity of â€œadvance consentâ€ is an issue which is being determined by the Canadian judiciary. Advance consent has been held to be invalid only in recent times. Throughout history, advance consent was recognised by both law and society, the &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/the-validity-of-advance-sexual-consent">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-validity-of-advance-sexual-consent/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ghost-writing, Plagiarism and Copyright</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/ghost-writing-plagiarism-and-copyright</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/ghost-writing-plagiarism-and-copyright#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ghost writing is intriguing because it exists in a gray area. It is clearly a form of plagiarism, although it is supposedly plagiarism with the consent of the actual author (the ghost writer) of the work. Perhaps that makes it &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/ghost-writing-plagiarism-and-copyright">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/ghost-writing-plagiarism-and-copyright/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi High Court takes up the &#8220;No Cashless Facility&#8221; Health Insurance Issue</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/court-takes-up-the-no-cashless-facility-health-insurance-issue</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/court-takes-up-the-no-cashless-facility-health-insurance-issue#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 02:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One might conclude that if one bought a health insurance policy, and paid a higher premium in order to avail of the &#8220;cashless facility&#8221;, the said &#8220;cashless facility&#8221; would actually be made available to one. Such a conclusion, however, apparently &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/court-takes-up-the-no-cashless-facility-health-insurance-issue">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/court-takes-up-the-no-cashless-facility-health-insurance-issue/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Juveniles Defined: 2000 Law Applies</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/juveniles-defined-2000-law-applies</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/juveniles-defined-2000-law-applies#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 08:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Juvenile Justice Act was passed in 1986. Fourteen years later, another Juvenile Justice Act was passed in 2000. Both of these Acts were meant to ensure that children who committed crimes were treated humanely and that they were given &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/juveniles-defined-2000-law-applies">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/juveniles-defined-2000-law-applies/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Protection to Women in Live-in Relationships</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/more-protection-to-women-in-live-in-relationships</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/more-protection-to-women-in-live-in-relationships#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 06:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dowry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women in live-in relationships are supposed to receive the same protection as wives when it comes to domestic violence. Now,Â  it appears that that protection also applies to dowry. Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code has long been &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/more-protection-to-women-in-live-in-relationships">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/more-protection-to-women-in-live-in-relationships/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pirates Flounder</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-pirates-flounder</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-pirates-flounder#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Shyam Somanadh Entertainment Industry Wins Pirate Bay Case, Loses $390 MN business opportunity By now it is all over the place that Pirate Bay (or at least the four defendants) has lost its lawsuit regarding their enablement of piracy &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/the-pirates-flounder">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-pirates-flounder/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>School Punishment Kills Student</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/school-punishment-kills-student</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/school-punishment-kills-student#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been reported that a girl in Delhi died after being punished in the municipal school she attended. Her name was Shanno, and she was eleven years old. Apparently, her teacher made her sit in a position imitating a &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/school-punishment-kills-student">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/school-punishment-kills-student/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

