<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawmatters.in &#187; Cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawmatters.in/content/category/litigation/cases/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawmatters.in</link>
	<description>Things that matter in law and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 18:28:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Films and the Copyright Amendment</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/films-and-the-copyright-amendment</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/films-and-the-copyright-amendment#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Assignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court of Bombay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court of Madras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read the entire paper on &#8220;Films and the Copyright Amendment Bill, 2010&#8243; at SSRN here. Download the entire paper from SSRN. (The post below is a part of the paper.) In 2006, the Copyright Office first put up a draft of proposed amendments to the Copyright Act on its website. Since then, the proposed amendments [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/films-and-the-copyright-amendment/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Juveniles Defined: 2000 Law Applies</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/juveniles-defined-2000-law-applies</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/juveniles-defined-2000-law-applies#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 08:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Juvenile Justice Act was passed in 1986. Fourteen years later, another Juvenile Justice Act was passed in 2000. Both of these Acts were meant to ensure that children who committed crimes were treated humanely and that they were given an adequate opportunity to reform themselves away from the influence of hardened criminals. One of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/juveniles-defined-2000-law-applies/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Protection to Women in Live-in Relationships</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/more-protection-to-women-in-live-in-relationships</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/more-protection-to-women-in-live-in-relationships#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 06:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dowry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women in live-in relationships are supposed to receive the same protection as wives when it comes to domestic violence. Now,  it appears that that protection also applies to dowry. Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code has long been criticised by so-called men&#8217;s rights activists who claim that they are doing such things as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/more-protection-to-women-in-live-in-relationships/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pirates Flounder</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-pirates-flounder</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-pirates-flounder#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Shyam Somanadh Entertainment Industry Wins Pirate Bay Case, Loses $390 MN business opportunity By now it is all over the place that Pirate Bay (or at least the four defendants) has lost its lawsuit regarding their enablement of piracy using the website. Neither will this ensure that piracy related to entertainment will come to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-pirates-flounder/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>School Punishment Kills Student</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/school-punishment-kills-student</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/school-punishment-kills-student#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been reported that a girl in Delhi died after being punished in the municipal school she attended. Her name was Shanno, and she was eleven years old. Apparently, her teacher made her sit in a position imitating a chicken for two hours in the sun and piled bricks on her back. The girl [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/school-punishment-kills-student/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Incident of Ragging</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/another-incident-of-ragging</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/another-incident-of-ragging#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every once in a while, the news of a student dying because of ragging hits headlines. Usually, it&#8217;s followed by a few debates on the telly after which everyone but those involved in and affected by the issue forget all about it. Until the next time it happens. On March 16, 2009, the issue came [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/another-incident-of-ragging/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The National Flower</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-national-flower</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-national-flower#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn’t seem too unreasonable at first glance to say that a national symbol should not be used by a political party for political gain. That is essentially what Shaheen Parvez has been saying for some five years now. However, on March 16, 2009, the Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition she filed on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-national-flower/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
