<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawmatters.in &#187; Supreme Court of India</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawmatters.in/content/category/litigation/cases/supreme-court-of-india/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawmatters.in</link>
	<description>Things that matter in law and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:43:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ghost-writing, Plagiarism and Copyright</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/ghost-writing-plagiarism-and-copyright</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/ghost-writing-plagiarism-and-copyright#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ghost writing is intriguing because it exists in a gray area. It is clearly a form of plagiarism, although it is supposedly plagiarism with the consent of the actual author (the ghost writer) of the work. Perhaps that makes it &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/ghost-writing-plagiarism-and-copyright">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/ghost-writing-plagiarism-and-copyright/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Juveniles Defined: 2000 Law Applies</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/juveniles-defined-2000-law-applies</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/juveniles-defined-2000-law-applies#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 08:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Juvenile Justice Act was passed in 1986. Fourteen years later, another Juvenile Justice Act was passed in 2000. Both of these Acts were meant to ensure that children who committed crimes were treated humanely and that they were given &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/juveniles-defined-2000-law-applies">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/juveniles-defined-2000-law-applies/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Protection to Women in Live-in Relationships</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/more-protection-to-women-in-live-in-relationships</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/more-protection-to-women-in-live-in-relationships#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 06:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dowry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women in live-in relationships are supposed to receive the same protection as wives when it comes to domestic violence. Now,Â  it appears that that protection also applies to dowry. Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code has long been &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/more-protection-to-women-in-live-in-relationships">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/more-protection-to-women-in-live-in-relationships/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>School Punishment Kills Student</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/school-punishment-kills-student</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/school-punishment-kills-student#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been reported that a girl in Delhi died after being punished in the municipal school she attended. Her name was Shanno, and she was eleven years old. Apparently, her teacher made her sit in a position imitating a &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/school-punishment-kills-student">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/school-punishment-kills-student/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Incident of Ragging</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/another-incident-of-ragging</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/another-incident-of-ragging#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every once in a while, the news of a student dying because of ragging hits headlines. Usually, it&#8217;s followed by a few debates on the telly after which everyone but those involved in and affected by the issue forget all &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/another-incident-of-ragging">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/another-incident-of-ragging/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The National Flower</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-national-flower</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-national-flower#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesnâ€™t seem too unreasonable at first glance to say that a national symbol should not be used by a political party for political gain. That is essentially what Shaheen Parvez has been saying for some five years now. However, &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/the-national-flower">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-national-flower/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Lowest Possible Sentence</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-lowest-possible-sentence</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-lowest-possible-sentence#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judges of high courts have been exercising much discretion in awarding sentences for various offences by reducing the sentences awarded by lower courts. For example, the High Court of Bombay let off a person convicted in an acid attack case &#8230; <a href="http://lawmatters.in/content/the-lowest-possible-sentence">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-lowest-possible-sentence/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

