<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawmatters.in &#187; Litigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawmatters.in/content/category/litigation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawmatters.in</link>
	<description>Things that matter in law and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 18:28:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Copyright Amendment Bill, 2010</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-copyright-amendment-bill-2010</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-copyright-amendment-bill-2010#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Matters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Assignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The has been introduced in the Rajya Sabha, and has been referred to a Select Committee chaired by Mr. Oscar Farnandes. In 2006, the Indian Copyright Office first put up a draft of the proposed amendments to the Copyright Act, 1957. The 2010 version is significantly different from the 2006 version, and is also not identical to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/the-copyright-amendment-bill-2010/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recognising Format Rights</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/recognising-format-rights</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/recognising-format-rights#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 10:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Format rights in Television Programmes are widely traded. They comprise, as their name suggests, rights to the formats of the programmes which may either be structures replicated in each episode of a programme (such as in The Crystal Maze) or in each series of a programme (such as in American Idol) or a combination of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/recognising-format-rights/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Films and the Copyright Amendment</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/films-and-the-copyright-amendment</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/films-and-the-copyright-amendment#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Assignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court of Bombay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court of Madras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read the entire paper on &#8220;Films and the Copyright Amendment Bill, 2010&#8243; at SSRN here. Download the entire paper from SSRN. (The post below is a part of the paper.) In 2006, the Copyright Office first put up a draft of proposed amendments to the Copyright Act on its website. Since then, the proposed amendments [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/films-and-the-copyright-amendment/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Audio-Visual Recordings and the Broadcast Reproduction Right</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/audio-visual-recordings-and-the-broadcast-reproduction-right</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/audio-visual-recordings-and-the-broadcast-reproduction-right#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=1006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Download the complete article: Time-Shifting Audio-Visual Recordings and the Broadcast Reproduction Right) There are times when the use of ‘and/or’ can be annoying. In a blog post, speaking of contracts, Ken Adams suggests that you ‘steer clear of ‘and/or’ unless using it would spare you some verbiage’. The ‘and/or’ alternative certainly is more compact but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/audio-visual-recordings-and-the-broadcast-reproduction-right/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>India and the Google Book Settlement</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/india-and-the-google-book-settlement</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/india-and-the-google-book-settlement#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Google Book Settlement has been widely debated. As Wikipedia explains, ‘the Google Book Search settlement agreement is the settlement agreement reached in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York after the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers sued Google in 2005 citing &#8220;massive copyright infringement&#8221; related to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/india-and-the-google-book-settlement/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Format Rights</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/format-rights</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/format-rights#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Format rights in Television Programmes are widely traded. They comprise, as their name suggests, rights to the formats of the programmes which may either be structures replicated in each episode of a programme (such as in The Crystal Maze) or in each series of a programme (such as in American Idol) or a combination of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/format-rights/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joint Ownership and Copyright Licences</title>
		<link>http://lawmatters.in/content/joint-ownership-and-copyright-licences</link>
		<comments>http://lawmatters.in/content/joint-ownership-and-copyright-licences#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandita Saikia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawmatters.in/?p=929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acquiring a license to use a copyrighted work is often difficult. For one thing, it is often not easy to determine who owns the copyright in the work. The enterprise of acquiring a license becomes even more difficult when the copyright in the work concerned is owned by more than one person. If not anything [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawmatters.in/content/joint-ownership-and-copyright-licences/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
